---

Background and Objective: The Detection of neurologic signs for topographical disorders in central nerves system can prevent unnecessary neuroimaging techniques such as MRI. This study was performed to determine the diagnostic value of physical examination for topographic detection of infratentorial lesions in patients with cerebrovascular syndromes. Methods: This descriptive study was done on 200 patients with cerebrovascular syndrome in Qaem Hospital in Mashhad, north-east Iran during 2011. Regarding to topographic physical examination, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of signs of syndromes were compared to MRI as gold standard method. Results: The accuracy of tetraparesis and crossed syndromes for localization of brain lesion in brainstem was 79% and 83%, respectively. The accuracy of hemiataxia for localization of brain lesion in ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere was 98%. The accuracy of Wallenberg syndrome for localization of brain lesion in posterolateral medulla was 98%. Conclusion: Using clinical neuro-examination skills and accurate topographic physical examination can prevent unwanted MRI technique for the diagnoses of cerebrovascular syndromes.

---

Background and Objective: Evaluating the agreement among various corneal imaging devices is crucial due to their varying technologies in diagnosing corneal parameters. This study aimed to assess the agreement of Advanced Corneal Explorer (ACE) with Pentacam and Orbscan in myopic individuals with healthy corneas.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 45 myopic individuals (25 women and 20 men; mean age=30.37±6.13 years) referring to Al-Zahra Ophthalmology Hospital in Zahedan, Iran, during 2023. Anterior segment imaging was performed using three devices: ACE, Pentacam, and Orbscan. Corneal parameters, including topography, tomography, and corneal aberrations, were examined. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to evaluate the agreement of ACE data with the data obtained from the other two devices.
Results: ACE exhibited good agreement with Pentacam for the mean power (ICC=0.97), maximum power (ICC=0.98), and minimum power of the anterior corneal surface (ICC=0.97) (P<0.05). Additionally, ACE exhibited good statistical agreement with Orbscan for the mean power of the anterior corneal surface due to an ICC of 0.98 (P<0.05). The ICC values for central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness with the ACE and Pentacam devices were 0.99 and 0.95, respectively, indicating significant statistical agreement (P<0.05). White-to-white distance, pupil size, and corneal aberrations did not show good agreement among the three devices (ICC<0.75).
Conclusion: Topography values and corneal thickness measured with ACE showed good agreement with Pentacam; therefore, they can be used interchangeably. Other measured variables from ACE did not show good agreement with Pentacam and Orbscan and are not interchangeable.